Westpac
Number of Fully Paid Ordinary Shares % Held
HSBC Custody Nominees (Australia) Limited 444,695,642 14.88
JP Morgan Nominees Australia Limited 379,805,564 12.71
National Nominees Limited 312,929,618 10.47
Citicorp Nominees Pty Limited 143,271,824 4.79
RBC Global Services Australia Nominees Pty Limited 73,948,625 2.47
Cogent Nominees Pty Limited 57,815,915 1.93
Top 20 CBA Shareholders
Name of Holder Number of Shares %
1 HSBC Custody Nominees (Australia) Limited 210,455,886 13.59
2 J P Morgan Nominees Australia Limited 154,853,734 10.00
3 National Nominees Limited 136,450,456 8.81
4 Citicorp Nominees Pty Limited 66,664,831 4.30
5 RBC Dexia Investor Services Australia Nominees Pty Limited 31,979,790 2.06
6 Cogent Nominees Pty Limited 24,434,228 1.58
7 ANZ Nominees Limited 15,756,788 1.02
8 AMP Life Limited 11,330,429 0.73
那么这些机构背后的投资者都是什么人呢？是买养老金的人？是澳洲人，新西兰人还是海外投资者？
哪里可以查到呢？作者: 萨米 时间: 2011-4-4 14:08:29
i think those are just big funds.... you really dont know who are at the back.作者: _Alex_ 时间: 2011-4-4 15:36:17
Is there no way of knowing that at all?
If the government wants to tax the big banks more than the small banks, would it want to know who the shareholders are?作者: 萨米 时间: 2011-4-4 15:43:33
If the super investors are the listed funds/firms, they have to disclose what they invest in. but if the investors are private equity funds/firms, they have no obligation to make their investments public.
Many companies registered in some small offshore islands, they can avoid to disclose their financial statements too...作者: 我是小马 时间: 2011-4-4 17:43:25
Say HSBC Custody Nominees (Australia) Limited, does anyone know where I can find who's put money into this company?
Also, why doesn't the governement simply break up the big banks to introduce more competition. What are the pros and cons?作者: _Alex_ 时间: 2011-4-4 18:31:18
Who agrees that banks are not competitive (e.g having some kind of monopoly power) in Australia and New Zealand?作者: 333111333 时间: 2011-4-4 18:50:26