新西兰天维网社区

标题: ZT: Leaky home family get $147,000 [打印本页]

作者: NewLynnHse 时间: 2013-10-10 11:12:16 标题: ZT: Leaky home family get $147,000

YY帝

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/property/news/article.cfm?c_id=8&objectid=11137625

An Auckland family have been awarded $147,000 after buying a leaky home in Te Atatu in 2009.

According to the decision of the Weathertight Homes Tribunal last month, Hailing Liu and her husband and son bought the three-storey property in Wakaroa Ave for $710,000. They had noticed hairline cracks but did not seek legal advice.

The tribunal determined the Auckland Council owed the Lius $245,000, cut by 40 per cent because of their contribution to the situation.

作者: NewLynnHse 时间: 2013-10-10 11:13:16

2009年还花了71W买的，这是什么概念啊？豪宅？

作者: NewLynnHse 时间: 2013-10-10 11:22:16

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/busine ... p;objectid=11137604

An Auckland family have been awarded $147,000 after purchasing a leaky home in the Auckland suburb of Te Atatu.

According to the decision of the Weathertight Homes Tribunal, released late last month, Hailing Liu, also known as Helen Liu, her husband Saili Liu, and their adult son Qianghua Liu, also known as Peter Liu, purchased the three storey property on Wakaroa Avenue for $710,000 in 2009.

They noticed hairline cracks on the building's exterior prior to purchase but did not seek legal advice.

Within four months of purchase they had arranged an assessment which confirmed it was a leaky home.

The tribunal determined the Lius were owed $200,000 for the amount the property's value had dropped since it was purchased, a further $20,000 for selling costs as well as $25,000 for general damages.

This was reduced by 40 per cent because of their contribution to the situation by not seeking legal advice, leaving them with $147,000.

The payment was to be made by Auckland Council, which had issued a code compliance certificate, the plasterer who worked on the house and the project manager.

作者: 紫鹤 时间: 2013-10-10 11:23:35

NewLynnHse 发表于 2013-10-10 11:13
2009年还花了71W买的，这是什么概念啊？豪宅？

three-storey property

作者: 阿海 时间: 2013-10-10 11:24:08

NewLynnHse 发表于 2013-10-10 11:13
2009年还花了71W买的，这是什么概念啊？豪宅？

这个房子有海景。

9 Wakaroa Ave

作者: NewLynnHse 时间: 2013-10-10 11:24:28

紫鹤发表于 2013-10-10 11:23
three-storey property

嗯，而且应该是新房子，不过贬值20W了

作者: 阿海 时间: 2013-10-10 11:25:14

14万7根本不够recladding。

作者: NewLynnHse 时间: 2013-10-10 11:25:47

阿海发表于 2013-10-10 11:24
这个房子有海景。

9 Wakaroa Ave

嘿嘿，我上street view转了一圈，怀疑就是这个房子

作者: 阿海 时间: 2013-10-10 11:26:35

NewLynnHse 发表于 2013-10-10 11:25
嘿嘿，我上street view转了一圈，怀疑就是这个房子

只有这个房子是3层的。

作者: NewLynnHse 时间: 2013-10-10 11:26:42

阿海发表于 2013-10-10 11:25
14万7根本不够recladding。

The tribunal determined the Lius were owed $200,000 for the amount the property's value had dropped since it was purchased, a further $20,000 for selling costs as well as $25,000 for general damages.

This was reduced by 40 per cent because of their contribution to the situation by not seeking legal advice, leaving them with $147,000.

？？？卖掉了？中介费还有的赔？

作者: jamienz 时间: 2013-10-10 11:28:39

花的是tax payer 的钱！

作者: 阿海 时间: 2013-10-10 11:40:37

NewLynnHse 发表于 2013-10-10 11:26
The tribunal determined the Lius were owed $200,000 for the amount the property's value had droppe ...

过去12个月都没看到这个房子在卖。

而且记录里他们还是物主。

欢迎光临新西兰天维网社区 (http://bbs.skytrade.co.nz/)