- UID
- 300589
- 热情
- 731
- 人气
- 1314
- 主题
- 9
- 帖子
- 708
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 1399
- 分享
- 0
- 记录
- 0
- 相册
- 0
- 好友
- 0
- 日志
- 0
- 在线时间
- 1673 小时
- 注册时间
- 2011-10-28
- 阅读权限
- 20
- 最后登录
- 2013-7-19
升级 39.9% - UID
- 300589
- 热情
- 731
- 人气
- 1314
- 主题
- 9
- 帖子
- 708
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 1399
- 阅读权限
- 20
- 注册时间
- 2011-10-28
|
本帖最后由 guncritx 于 2013-5-9 00:20 编辑
From RBNZ:
The Reserve Bank has consulted on four tools
it has identified as being helpful in addressing one or
both of the above objectives: adjustments to the core
funding ratio; a counter-cyclical capital buffer; sectoral
capital requirements; and loan-to-value ratio (LVR)
restrictions for residential mortgages.
......
Much of the focus in the submissions was on the
use of LVR restrictions. Key concerns were around
the potential adverse effects such restrictions could
have on first-home buyers, small businesses, and the
Canterbury rebuild. Some submitters suggested that
LVR restrictions could best be applied with exemptions
for some borrowers or targeted at particular regions
where high-LVR lending was more prevalent
LVR) restrictions, but with different features to suit
the circumstances of their respective economies. For
example, maximum LVR ratios of 85 percent were
introduced in Norway and Sweden while in Israel,
where high-LVR lending is less prevalent, LVR ratios
were capped at 75 percent for first-time buyers and
50 percent for investors. In Canada, the Government
plays a dominant role in insuring mortgages and the
policy response involved a tightening of the conditions
required to qualify for this insurance. This included
a reduction in the allowable LVR to 80 percent for
mortgage refinancing or for investment properties, and a
reduction in the maximum allowable mortgage term to 25
years. Switzerland has taken a different approach with
the recent announcement of a macro-prudential capital
buffer applying to banks’ housing exposures
source: http://www.rbnz.govt.nz/finstab/fsreport/fsr_may13_a.pdf
http://www.rbnz.govt.nz/finstab/fsreport/fsr_may13_b.pdf |
|