- UID
- 153731
- 热情
- 18362
- 人气
- 19256
- 主题
- 62
- 帖子
- 2637
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 20186
- 分享
- 0
- 记录
- 0
- 相册
- 0
- 好友
- 0
- 日志
- 0
- 在线时间
- 2746 小时
- 注册时间
- 2008-8-22
- 阅读权限
- 30
- 最后登录
- 2024-10-23
升级 0.93% - UID
- 153731
- 热情
- 18362
- 人气
- 19256
- 主题
- 62
- 帖子
- 2637
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 20186
- 阅读权限
- 30
- 注册时间
- 2008-8-22
|
这个跟党派无关,是有钱人请得起好律师。
>> 受害人没死不是因为罪犯手下留情,而是因为受害人儿子恰好路过第一时间施救。
这句话不能当作事实,这个是原告说辞,而且是“likely”,这个案件表面上就是打架伤人事件几乎没差别。
During his sentencing at Manukau District Court today, the court was told that Clarke was driving his Tesla on Batty Rd in Karaka, south Auckland, when the dog walker stepped onto the road and gestured for him to slow down.
Clarke did slow down, then drove around the dog walker, who tapped the roof of his car as it passed.
简单翻译就是:
A开车回家,B 牵狗挡路,而且打手势让A减速(估计路很小,B怕车惊吓到狗狗?)
A确实放慢了速度,然后绕过遛狗者B
A车经过时,遛狗者B拍打A的车顶 (这个等于B先攻击别人了,)
然后A停车,打架开始,对方有狗,也不可能空手去打,这过程细节估计要先吵架才会动手。
|
|