- UID
- 17023
- 热情
- 399
- 人气
- 407
- 主题
- 6
- 帖子
- 3827
- 精华
- 1
- 积分
- 2337
- 分享
- 0
- 记录
- 0
- 相册
- 1
- 好友
- 2
- 日志
- 0
- 在线时间
- 1587 小时
- 注册时间
- 2002-7-26
- 阅读权限
- 30
- 最后登录
- 2024-7-25
升级 22.47% - UID
- 17023
- 热情
- 399
- 人气
- 407
- 主题
- 6
- 帖子
- 3827
- 精华
- 1
- 积分
- 2337
- 阅读权限
- 30
- 注册时间
- 2002-7-26
|
poker's different to chess.
With chess, it's very necessary to go through historical games. Because each move is unique, which you can easily say if it's a good move or not.
There're way too many variances at any given time in a poker game. Whether it's a cash game or a tournament, the style of each players, the stack situation, the pot situation etc. It's not good to watch and learn from a historic game unless you have a good base understanding of strategies. Otherwise it would be easily misleading.
Poker's like stock investment, there are millions of different strategies, while the base is simple and obvious. You can't use all the strategies at once, because some of them contradict each other. You need to learn and master a few strategies. The combination of the strategy will ensure you a certain success rate, you may lose a game or two when u stick into your strategy (due to bad hand etc). but as long as you stick too it, you will earn more than lose long term.
Any way, my point is that Strategy is more important than learning historic games... |
|