- UID
- 313047
- 热情
- 1166
- 人气
- 1927
- 主题
- 97
- 帖子
- 1797
- 精华
- 1
- 积分
- 2511
- 分享
- 0
- 记录
- 0
- 相册
- 2
- 好友
- 0
- 日志
- 0
- 在线时间
- 1555 小时
- 注册时间
- 2012-2-25
- 阅读权限
- 30
- 最后登录
- 2016-4-22
升级 34.07% - UID
- 313047
- 热情
- 1166
- 人气
- 1927
- 主题
- 97
- 帖子
- 1797
- 精华
- 1
- 积分
- 2511
- 阅读权限
- 30
- 注册时间
- 2012-2-25
|
In a statement, the National Party said it completely rejected the allegations the music used in its early campaign advertisements had infringed the copyright of any artist’s work.
“The National Party purchased the music in question from recognised production music supplier Beatbox, based in Australia and Singapore. The music was originally published by Spider Cues Music, a well-established Los Angeles-based provider of music to the film and entertainment industry.
“As with all works licensed by the Beatbox library music service, the National Party was assured the music in question did not infringe any copyright and was an original work.
“Furthermore, the music license and fee were arranged through the Australasian Performing Rights Association and Australasian Mechanical Copyright Owners Society (Apra/Amcos), who act as agents for Beatbox in Australia and New Zealand.
“These organisations exist to protect the rights of artists.
“Regardless, as our advertising was moving on to different material at the time of the complaint, over two weeks ago, we were able to accommodate the complaining artist and undertake not to continue using the track. However, this has not satisfied the complainant.”
The National Party said the song had been licensed multiple times both in Australia and New Zealand without issue or complaint. |
|