謝謝大家.問題已解決

[u]nic706

本人在用 canon eos 40d, 想買一只ultra wide.
因爲我對鏡頭是在毫無了解~所以請大家幫幫忙..
正在考慮是入原厰的canon 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5  還是 副厰sigma的10-20mm f/4-5.6
因爲原厰的鏡頭大約要1300nzd的樣子.副厰的要便宜大概300塊,
還有看到sigma有一只  12-24mm f/4.5-5.6,又有什麽不一樣呢??

謝謝達人的解答


看了很多對比還有評論.當然還有達人們的幫忙和意見
最終還是以金錢為出發點~... 決定買sigma的10-20mm f4-5.6
拿到鏡頭再像大家彙報吧

[ 本帖最后由 nic706 于 2009-8-28 10:55 编辑 ]

Eyeport

in conclusion....you won't need one...you got 17mm

Eyeport

ok seriously, if i would need to pick one that would be the Sigma 10-20....i see no point investing in Canon10-22 if you are going to upgrade to 5DII in the future anyway....they both are DX lens btw.

Sigma12-24 is FF....but I its not so good

If i were you I would just stick to 17-55 2.8 and move on to get 85mm or 70-200L, I would also welcome a fisheye lens

siyuan79

对于佳能的镜头不太熟悉。

适马10-20 这个镜头，前两天用了一下（当然是尼康口的），大致和网上评测说的差不多，畸变比较厉害，其他都还好，评价都不错，国内的价格好像是不到4000人民币。

12-24是全服头，10-20是DX头，价格也是前者贵，没有必要。

不过有一点，10-20这个镜头的光圈是在是太小了。

[u]nic706

10-20本來就應該變形變得很厲害呀不是嗎... ...
在camera and camera試過canon的10-22...很,強,大..突然覺得空間變好大.. ..
btw,,繼續搜集意見... ...

[u]nic706

原帖由 Eyeport 于 2009-8-26 01:30 发表
ok seriously, if i would need to pick one that would be the Sigma 10-20....i see no point investing in Canon10-22 if you are going to upgrade to 5DII in the future anyway....they both are DX lens btw. ...

not gona upgrade to 5d II since im not skillful enough to operate dat camera. i'll stick with my 40d and upgrade my photography skills before i upgrade the camera.lol...
yea,im kinda "need " 1.. n since theres quiet a price difference between the sigma and canon,n i neva try sigma lens.. so just gathering info from everybody ..i only want to know if it make reli huge difference between the 2.if not, of coz i would b happi 2 get a sigma instead..more economy =)

sum41

Try sigma 14 f2.8,lz

BabyG

nic要買廣角啦??~~ 期待作品~~~hehe

yellowS15

nic,
i used a Sigma 10-20 f/4-5.6 before with my D200. I quite like it. Colour and contrast are good,  AF is fast and quiet..  quite sharp once you stop down a bit but if you do pixel peeping than the other more expensive super wide are indeed sharper. build quality is quite good too

and i just LOVE how wide it is..   

siyuan79

原帖由 yellowS15 于 2009-8-27 15:24 发表
nic,
i used a Sigma 10-20 f/4-5.6 before with my D200. I quite like it. Colour and contrast are good,  AF is fast and quiet..  quite sharp once you stop down a bit but if you do pixel peeping than th ...

超广里面，适马的10-20评价还是挺好的。不过不知道最近新出的那一批不知道怎样了，

不过我估计nic拍摄题材，F4-5.6能不能满足到她。。

yellowS15

原帖由 siyuan79 于 2009-8-27 16:15 发表


超广里面，适马的10-20评价还是挺好的。不过不知道最近新出的那一批不知道怎样了，

不过我估计nic拍摄题材，F4-5.6能不能满足到她。。

Nic拍摄题材不就是隨便亂拍?   隨便SuperWide鏡頭也满足她了 , 嘿嘿!
但認真說,我個人認為 Super Wide 光圈對普通人並不太重要, 1 安全快門速度已經非常慢, 2.即使你有f/2.8, 你也難拍很淺景深的圖...

當然，說是這樣說, 我還是想要Nikon 14-24 f/2.8

Eyeport

原帖由 yellowS15 于 2009-8-27 15:24 发表
nic,
i used a Sigma 10-20 f/4-5.6 before with my D200. I quite like it. Colour and contrast are good,  AF is fast and quiet..  quite sharp once you stop down a bit but if you do pixel peeping than th ...

hey hey S15 no HDR image cheating pls....haha

[u]nic706

原帖由 yellowS15 于 2009-8-27 17:55 发表


Nic拍摄题材不就是隨便亂拍?   隨便SuperWide鏡頭也满足她了 , 嘿嘿!
但認真說,我個人認為 Super Wide 光圈對普通人並不太重要, 1 安全快門速度已經非常慢, 2.即使你有f/2.8, 你也難拍很淺景深的圖...

當然， ...

看了詳細的講解還有強大的圖片.恩,,我決定買sigma了..
性價比都比較高呢.幾天后就拿到了.到時候再向大家彙報吧
想不到我也有買鏡頭的這一天...

[u]nic706

原帖由 Eyeport 于 2009-8-27 23:22 发表

hey hey S15 no HDR image cheating pls....haha

y HDR = cheating?
its picture effect,not relate to the quality of the lens itselves
anyway im going for the sigma ...
gona purchase it today... ....