新西兰天维网社区

标题: Consumer NZ 调查出炉：新西兰最认可省电灯列表（图） [打印本页]

作者: virus 时间: 2011-7-25 23:34:55 标题: Consumer NZ 调查出炉：新西兰最认可省电灯列表（图）

CFL bulbs Updated: 29 Jun 2011
About our test
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Our test rig
We chose 19 CFLs. All but 2 claimed to be a replacement for a traditional 100W incandescent bulb. 13 were rated at 20W and 6 at 18W. All were warm white.

The CFLs were mainly spiral tubes but there were also 4 “stick” (U-tube) types and two covered globes (the ones that look like a traditional bulb). The spiral shape has pretty much taken over the home-CFL market because it gives a more even distribution of light than the earlier U-tube style, which tends to spray most of the light sideways. The spiral shapes were the best performers in our test.

Light output
We wanted to see if the CFLs were as “bright” as the bulbs they replaced. So we put two samples of all the CFLs into a special test rig and compared the total light output of each model with the averaged light output from 8 different 100W incandescent bulbs. This averaged “incandescent” figure formed our baseline – and the light output of the CFLs is their relative performance against this baseline.

Switching life
We also put 3 samples of 19 of the CFLs into a special rig which switched the bulbs on for 5 minutes and off for 5 minutes 6000 times – nearly 6 weeks of on-off cycling. The bulbs were continuously monitored so that we could tell if and when they failed. We tested only 19 bulbs for this because the Panasonic CFL wasn’t available for the start of the test (see below).

Panasonic
Panasonic bulbs are new to the market and they missed the early part of our “switching life” test. When we published this report they’d completed 5165 on-off cycles without failure. We’re leaving them in the test rig until they reach 10,000 on-off cycles – we’ll report on them then.

We also tested them for light output: they produced 20 percent more light than our baseline.

作者: lzh47 时间: 2011-7-25 23:35:25

菲利普可以有！

作者: shot 时间: 2011-7-25 23:36:20

节能灯泡贵~~~但是省电·~~~~~~一个好一点的节能灯泡一年也就不到20刀电费，蛮划算的

作者: 混口饭 时间: 2011-7-25 23:38:44

我承认省电，但十几二十元一个的灯泡让我买的时候很纠结，怕寿命短。

作者: UV15 时间: 2011-7-25 23:58:30

真的不便宜。

然后前两天还被我摔了一个新买的。郁闷。

作者: shot 时间: 2011-7-25 23:59:50

真的不便宜。

然后前两天还被我摔了一个新买的。郁闷。
UV15 发表于 2011-7-25 22:58

有一种打折的时候10刀4个装的不错，单卖一个就七八刀呢

作者: virus 时间: 2011-7-26 00:02:35

trademe上有便宜的为什么一定要买full retail price？而且有很多都是装修多于的，或者放garage没用的。

作者: FlipFlap 时间: 2011-7-26 00:03:49

飞利浦的那个可以用很久

作者: virus 时间: 2011-7-26 00:04:49

飞利浦的那个可以用很久
FlipFlap 发表于 2011-7-25 23:03

philips 3 年

作者: 断了的线 时间: 2011-7-26 00:07:29

这个顶一下。。。有用。。。

作者: xli422 时间: 2011-7-26 00:21:37

现在的社会 LED灯泡才是王道啊一个LED灯泡比这些所谓的ECO灯泡还省电60%-70%！！！！！！！！！！！！！

作者: anna228 时间: 2011-7-26 00:41:13

好的能用七八年。。。。

作者: hfsniper 时间: 2011-7-26 01:01:35

现在的社会 LED灯泡才是王道啊一个LED灯泡比这些所谓的ECO灯泡还省电60%-70%！！！！！！！！！！！！！
xli422 发表于 2011-7-25 23:21

LED好像每个还要装变压器才能用

作者: MaxPower 时间: 2011-7-26 01:46:18

很后悔当年eco打折没把家里的全换了，，只换了常用的，哈

这贴子好，飞利浦的价格只能说一分钱一分货

欢迎光临新西兰天维网社区 (http://bbs.skytrade.co.nz/)