新西兰天维网社区

标题: 请教帕萨特和凯美瑞 [打印本页]

作者: 情有独钟 时间: 2011-12-10 18:52:51 标题: 请教帕萨特和凯美瑞

请教大家2011年的camry sportivo和passat 哪一个性价比更高一些呢？在价钱差不多的情况下，谢谢。

作者: repco 时间: 2011-12-10 19:04:04

当然是帕萨特拉！！！！！！！！！！！！！！

作者: 情有独钟 时间: 2011-12-10 19:06:01

为什么呀？

作者: 给力2000后 时间: 2011-12-10 19:07:58

实际2个价钱差的比较多吧

作者: 情有独钟 时间: 2011-12-10 19:12:03

差了3000左右

作者: ~春天花花~ 时间: 2011-12-10 19:52:39

是我就camry sportivo，省心，过保也绝不担心。。。帕沙特过保前就要出手。。

作者: 情有独钟 时间: 2011-12-10 20:29:05

lsd朋友能说说为什么帕萨特过保前就要出手么？是因为修起来贵？容易坏？

作者: LAZIE 时间: 2011-12-10 20:52:33

CAMRY SPORTIVO +1

買PASSAT不如買A4拉

作者: 野人野人 时间: 2011-12-10 20:57:03

欧洲车跟日本车开起来决对不一样的，自己去试一下，喜欢哪台买哪台憋。。。。。。。。。

作者: 爱国爱港 时间: 2011-12-10 22:13:55

情有独钟发表于 2011-12-10 20:29
lsd朋友能说说为什么帕萨特过保前就要出手么？是因为修起来贵？容易坏？

因为帕萨特是欧洲车

作者: 爱国爱港 时间: 2011-12-10 22:17:02

野人野人发表于 2011-12-10 20:57
欧洲车跟日本车开起来决对不一样的，自己去试一下，喜欢哪台买哪台憋。。。。。。。。。

帕萨特或者A4更有驾驶乐趣，camry是省心、耐操（但听说新camry的自排是马马虎虎）和保值

作者: h37l 时间: 2011-12-10 22:25:48

开过欧洲车的不想再开日本车，修过欧洲车滴马上换日本车

作者: ~春天花花~ 时间: 2011-12-10 23:04:13

波箱问题不解决前基本是不考虑帕萨特的。。车是绝对好车，很够力，也是因为这个不喜欢。。。

作者: masterq 时间: 2011-12-10 23:19:14

camry sportivo

作者: KsMotor 时间: 2011-12-11 08:41:20

100% toyota camry sport版

作者: PLA1987 时间: 2011-12-11 21:11:28

近些年的帕萨特还是很不错的，不管是性能，操控，还是内饰，个人认为要好于凯美瑞，但从保值和省心的角度看，凯美瑞也不错

作者: 爱国爱港 时间: 2011-12-13 22:11:59

h37l 发表于 2011-12-10 22:25
开过欧洲车的不想再开日本车，修过欧洲车滴马上换日本车

http://www.dogandlemon.com/media/warning-over-european-cars

Warning over European cars
MEDIA RELEASE - 18/10/2011
New Zealand and Australian motorists who choose European cars are often buying some of the world's worst lemons, says the car review website dogandlemon.com.

Editor Clive Matthew-Wilson says:

“New Zealand motorists often think they are getting an upmarket vehicle when they buy a European brand. However, the opposite is true: European vehicles are generally poorly built, unreliable and expensive to fix.”

Matthew-Wilson quoted a recent car reliability survey by the giant English consumer organization Which?

Of the 34 makes surveyed, Volkswagen was 15th, BMW was 18th, Audi was 20th, Peugeot was 25th, Fiat was 29th, Renault was 32nd and Alfa Romeo was last. The highest rating European model was Mercedes, which came tenth. All the top nine ratings went to Japanese or Korean makes (see the full list below).

Matthew-Wilson adds:

“Because many small European models are available with super-efficient engines, customers are buying these cars believing that they'll save money. In fact the opposite is likely to be true: the money these customers save on fuel is likely to be a drop in the ocean compared to the high cost of servicing and repairs, coupled with a shocking depreciation."

“Virtually all reliability surveys say the same thing: European brands may look cool, but they’re the pits to own.”

“Next to their house, a car is most people's most expensive purchase, yet the majority of car buyers purchase their vehicles without the faintest idea of what they are getting themselves into. If the New Zealanders who buy European cars knew the track record of these so-called prestige brands, they'd probably never buy them. ”

Here’s the Which? magazine 2011 list of reliable brands, from the best to the worst:

Honda
Daihatsu
Toyota
Mitsubishi
Lexus
Mazda
Suzuki
Subaru
Kia
Mercedes-Benz
Hyundai
Skoda
Chevrolet (mostly built by Daewoo)
Nissan
Volkswagen
Mini
Volvo
BMW
Ford
Audi
Seat
Vauxhall (mostly built by Opel)
Porsche
Smart
Peugeot
Jeep
Jaguar
Citroen
Fiat
Chrysler
Saab
Renault
Land Rover
Alfa Romeo

作者: 910704 时间: 2011-12-28 01:43:11

还是passat吧虽然四大破之一也比安全设计有缺陷的佳美强

欢迎光临新西兰天维网社区 (http://bbs.skytrade.co.nz/)