新西兰天维网社区

标题: 如今的配偶担保双方还是会有5年限制吗？ [打印本页]

作者: bennayon 时间: 2014-1-14 20:53:48 标题: 如今的配偶担保双方还是会有5年限制吗？

没啥变化吗？主申请副申请，别管是谁担保谁，还是双方从没有PR到同时贴纸的。5年内都不可以担保别人吧？

谢

作者: 高飞 时间: 2014-1-14 21:43:05

主副申请人同时申请技术移民的不算担保

作者: 高飞 时间: 2014-1-14 21:43:54

本帖最后由高飞于 2014-1-14 20:44 编辑

楼主的中文不行，很难看懂楼主的帖子，楼主不是从国内回来的么？

作者: bennayon 时间: 2014-1-15 17:02:38

高飞发表于 2014-1-14 21:43
楼主的中文不行，很难看懂楼主的帖子，楼主不是从国内回来的么？

哈哈不好意思，给你带来混或了。

我去年问了移民局，主申请、副申请在都没有PR的情况下申请PR成功后，双方也是有5年后才能担保别人的限制。不知道今年是否依然？

谢

作者: 高飞 时间: 2014-1-15 17:36:49

bennayon 发表于 2014-1-15 16:02
哈哈不好意思，给你带来混或了。

我去年问了移民局，主申请、副申请在都没有PR的情况下申请PR成功后， ...

这我第一次听说，移民局网站上有链接么？

作者: bennayon 时间: 2014-1-15 17:55:21

高飞发表于 2014-1-15 17:36
这我第一次听说，移民局网站上有链接么？

我也觉得同时申请到PR的不应该受这限制。

后来移民官给我发了个条款，说同时申请到的也算在Under Partnership，好像是F.10.10, 这样。

作者: joefox604461 时间: 2014-1-15 18:45:13

既然有主，副申请那么肯定是一方担保一方啦！不然哪还有副申请？

作者: 高飞 时间: 2014-1-15 19:11:53

bennayon 发表于 2014-1-15 16:55
我也觉得同时申请到PR的不应该受这限制。

后来移民官给我发了个条款，说同时申请到的也算在Under Part ...

eligible to support an application

From instructions: F2.10 Definitions (Partnership Category)

F2.10.10 Definition of ‘eligible to support an application for a residence class visa’ for the purposes of Partnership Category

To be eligible to support an application for a residence class visa under the Partnership Category, the New Zealand partner must:
      meet the character requirement for partners supporting applications made under the Partnership Category as set out at R5.95; and
      have not previously supported more than one other successful principal applicant under Partnership Category; and
      have not supported any other successful principal applicant under Partnership Category in the five years immediately preceding the date the current application is made; and
      not, in the seven years prior to the date the application is made, have been the perpetrator of an incident of domestic violence which has resulted in the grant of a resident visa to a person under the category for victims of domestic violence (see S4.5).
If the New Zealand partner was previously a successful principal applicant under Partnership Category then they will be considered to be eligible only if:
      at least five years have elapsed since the date he or she was granted residence under the Partnership Category at the time the current application is made; and
      he or she has not supported any other successful principal applicant under the Partnership Category.

Note: Applications under Partnership Category include applications made under the Family Category Spouse and De facto partner policy in force before Partnership Category took effect.

上面写的是Under Partnership Category，配偶一起技术移民的应该算Under Skill Migrant Category

作者: technerd 时间: 2014-1-15 19:45:55

本帖最后由 technerd 于 2014-1-15 19:47 编辑

高飞发表于 2014-1-15 19:11
eligible to support an application

From instructions: F2.10 Definitions (Partnership Category)
...

也不可以的。

高飞贴的是10年版的instruction。已经改过两次。

最新的instruction是这样的：

F2.10.10 Definition of ‘eligible to support a residence class visa application under the Partnership Category
For a New Zealand partner (F2.10.2) to be eligible to support a residence class visa application under the Partnership Category they:
must not have acted as a partner in more than one previous successful residence class visa application; and
must not have acted as a partner in a successful application for a residence class visa in the last five years; and
cannot have been the perpetrator of an incident of domestic violence which has resulted in the grant of a resident visa to a person under the category for victims of domestic violence (see S4.5) in the seven years prior to the date the application is made; and
must meet the character requirement for partners supporting applications made under the Partnership Category as set out in R5.95.
A New Zealand partner is considered to have acted as a partner if they previously:
supported a successful Partnership Category application for a residence class visa; or
were the principal applicant in a successful Partnership Category application for a residence class visa; or
were the principal applicant in a successful application for a residence class visa that included a secondary applicant partner, excluding residence class visa applications made under RV After the grant of a resident visa; or
were a secondary applicant partner in a successful application for a residence class visa, excluding residence class visa applications made under RV After the grant of a resident visa.
http://www.immigration.govt.nz/opsmanual/46176.htm

申请表，也写了：

Partnership Support Form for Residence (INZ 1178)

图片附件: elligibility.JPG (2014-1-15 19:45:40, 191.17 KB) / 下载次数 0
https://bbs.skytrade.co.nz/forum.php?mod=attachment&aid=NjcxMzYyfGE5MjE0MWZhfDE3NzI3MTA5MTh8MHww

作者: technerd 时间: 2014-1-15 19:48:35

bennayon 发表于 2014-1-15 17:55
我也觉得同时申请到PR的不应该受这限制。

后来移民官给我发了个条款，说同时申请到的也算在Under Part ...

请看9楼

作者: bennayon 时间: 2014-1-15 21:28:09

joefox604461 发表于 2014-1-15 18:45
既然有主，副申请那么肯定是一方担保一方啦！不然哪还有副申请？

恩是这么个理儿

作者: bennayon 时间: 2014-1-15 21:34:57

technerd 发表于 2014-1-15 19:45
也不可以的。

高飞贴的是10年版的instruction。已经改过两次。

恩对，我看的也是这个。

谢

作者: bennayon 时间: 2014-1-15 21:42:50

technerd 发表于 2014-1-15 19:45
也不可以的。

高飞贴的是10年版的instruction。已经改过两次。

must not have acted as a partner in more than one previous successful residence class visa application;

嘛玩意儿？一人只能一次了？

作者: flownorth 时间: 2014-1-16 11:16:54

是要5年的，我在帮我老公担保，昨天我们就收到了移民官的信，这个新的政策是2013年4月8日更改的。

作者: bennayon 时间: 2014-1-16 21:47:05

flownorth 发表于 2014-1-16 11:16
是要5年的，我在帮我老公担保，昨天我们就收到了移民官的信，这个新的政策是2013年4月8日更改的。

是吧？本来两口子一起拿身份是不属于什么他妈的配偶类下面的，居然也划分到配偶类了嘿。

欢迎光临新西兰天维网社区 (https://bbs.skytrade.co.nz/)