新西兰天维网社区

标题: 违法了,作假了,所以挨罚了,曝光了, FML了。。。。。 [打印本页]

作者: 匿名    时间: 2015-3-12 10:18:09     标题: 违法了,作假了,所以挨罚了,曝光了, FML了。。。。。

餐饮公司拒绝提供劳动合同,不给假期工资,不给带薪病假,不保留考勤表,错上加错的是,还不配合劳工部的督察。。。。。。更有甚者,事发后还试图掩盖违法事实。。。。。


结果就是,被告上ERA,挨罚了。还有就是,全国范围曝光了, 这下FML 了。  


Catering company ordered to pay $10,000


The Beirnes appeared to have shown "prevarication and non co-operation" in their dealings with the inspector, the authority said.

A Greymouth catering company has been ordered to pay more than $10,000 for serious labour law breaches.

The Employment Relations Authority has ordered Chez Beirne Catering and Homestay to pay more than $6000 holiday arrears and has fined the company $4000.


The authority said the company's owners, Lynnette and Richard Beirne, appeared to have deliberately failed to pay, then tried to hide their failures.


The Ministry of [color=rgb(28, 125, 255) !important][backcolor=transparent !important]Business, Innovation and Employment's Labour Inspectorate investigated Chez Beirne last year after receiving a complaint from a former employee who had worked as a catering assistant.

The investigation found that Chez Beirne had not paid the employee [color=rgb(28, 125, 255) !important][backcolor=transparent !important]holiday pay, as legally required.

Chez Beirne also failed to provide the inspectorate with a copy of employment agreements, time, wage and holiday records, despite multiple requests.


The authority found that the employee should be paid the holiday arrears, plus [color=rgb(28, 125, 255) !important][backcolor=transparent !important]interest. It also issued Chez Beirne with a $4000 fine for failing to comply with the Holidays Act.


The authority said the Beirnes had not provided any substantive reply to the claims made by the labour inspector. Nor had they complied with an improvement notice, served last July, requiring them to provide documentation.


The authority said the employee had worked about 30 hours a week for the company from July 24, 2011 to December 6, 2013.


She notified the inspector that she had not received any paid annual leave during her employment and had received $471 as holiday pay when her employment ended.


The inspector calculated she was owed $6348 for sick leave, bereavement and other leave.

The Beirnes were given until October 29, 2014 to pay up, or explain why they disagreed with the sum.

The inspector said neither had happened.


The authority ordered the company to pay the $6348. It did not order payment by instalments as it had no evidence the Beirnes' financial position required it.


The authority also imposed interest of 5 per [color=rgb(28, 125, 255) !important][backcolor=transparent !important]cent a year. It said the Beirnes had not explained why they had failed to pay the correct sums, so it couldn't assess whether there was good reason for the failure.

The Beirnes appeared to have shown "prevarication and non co-operation" in their dealings with the inspector, the authority said.


They had apparently been "trying to hide their failures to pay, and that their failures were deliberate".

Their failure to pay holiday pay was a serious breach of the Holidays Act. The appropriate penalty was $2500, the authority said.


It imposed a $500 penalty for failure to pay final holiday pay and $1000 for failure to pay sick pay and bereavement pay. It ordered $1000 be paid to the employee and the remaining $3000 to the authority.

Costs were reserved, except for the authority's lodgement fee of $71.56 which the Beirnes were ordered to pay.


Labour Inspectorate southern [color=rgb(28, 125, 255) !important][backcolor=transparent !important]regional manager Stuart Lumsden said the inspectorate took any breaches of minimum employment rights seriously.


"It is a concern that an employer felt they could bypass these laws without consequences. The penalty sends a clear message to employers that failure to comply with the minimum [color=rgb(28, 125, 255) !important][backcolor=transparent !important]employment standards will result in enforcement action," said Mr Lumsden.


The ministry encouraged anyone in this situation, or who knew of anyone in this situation, to call its contact centre on 0800 20 90 20.







作者: simophin    时间: 2015-3-12 10:38:59

罚的好,来nz不就是为了这边的工作环境吗?再把国内那一套带过来,干嘛不在国内呆着
作者: 巴依老爷    时间: 2015-3-12 11:04:06

来的人多,想留下来的人多,没能力还像赖着不走的人多。。。
嘿嘿
这种情况不会避免的~
作者: 匿名    时间: 2015-3-12 11:05:04

LYNNETTE BEIRNE and RICHARD BEIRNE
从名字上看,似乎是两个Kiwi。

作者: cym    时间: 2015-3-12 11:07:56

simophin 发表于 2015-3-12 10:38
罚的好,来nz不就是为了这边的工作环境吗?再把国内那一套带过来,干嘛不在国内呆着 ...

这个新闻和国内没有1毛钱的关系啊!
为什么啥坏事都要和国内挂上呢?
作者: 阳光男人    时间: 2015-3-12 11:21:12

怎么才罚这点?
作者: Jackpot    时间: 2015-3-12 11:43:51

may  ?????????
作者: 匿名    时间: 2015-3-12 12:01:52

cym 发表于 2015-3-12 11:07
这个新闻和国内没有1毛钱的关系啊!
为什么啥坏事都要和国内挂上呢?

华人雇主这样做的有不少。。。。事实啊。。。。。。如果有人告,也会被罚吧?
作者: AUprince    时间: 2015-3-12 13:09:47

弱弱的问一句,没有签合同的属于causal worker?那这种应该有holiday pay吗?
作者: 阿海    时间: 2015-3-12 13:28:33

罚太少了!
作者: 我选择新西兰    时间: 2015-3-12 13:28:39

是不是casual , 不完全取决于合同。
假期工资都必须有。
作者: Eason321    时间: 2015-3-12 14:12:55

simophin 发表于 2015-3-12 09:38
罚的好,来nz不就是为了这边的工作环境吗?再把国内那一套带过来,干嘛不在国内呆着 ...

看看清楚再评论好么。。。
作者: 匿名    时间: 2015-3-13 14:57:30

点击量很高,回帖量很低。多少是个禁忌话题。
作者: anxin09    时间: 2015-3-13 20:45:10

cym 发表于 2015-3-12 11:07
这个新闻和国内没有1毛钱的关系啊!
为什么啥坏事都要和国内挂上呢?

说的就是啊

作者: 帕洛玛    时间: 2015-3-14 00:12:16

我还以为是那间啥茶的事




欢迎光临 新西兰天维网社区 (http://bbs.skytrade.co.nz/) Powered by Discuz! X2