If you were required to wear a uniform as part of your role, and you were provided with that uniform by the organisation, you would not have received any gain or reward and would not be in breach of your visa.
If you were given a clothing voucher in exchange for your voluntary activity, then you would have received a reward and you would be in breach of your visa.
If your intention is to receive a gain or reward i.e. any payment or benefit such as board and lodging or goods (e.g. food, clothing and services) that can be valued in terms of money, then you are not considered to be a volunteer.
Volunteers generally work for charities or not-for-profit organisations.
这个扯的有点远了, health and safety 里的几个test在断定是否employee的时候也有不错的比重 你的这个例子所有的三个test都不符合,而版主们符合全部 你看是不
Volunteers are considered “employees” for the purposes of
the Act when:
a. the volunteer is doing work for an ‘employer’ or a ‘selfemployed
person’ who has given consent to, or has
knowledge about, the voluntary work; and
b. the volunteer does the work on an ongoing and regular
basis for that employer or self-employed person; and
c. the work is an integral part of the business of that
employer or self-employed person.
In these cases most of the duties of an employer apply (see
below), and they are enforceable. 作者: 灰色夜宵 时间: 2015-6-9 08:52:42
你给的链接也写着很清楚 (ii)receives no reward for work performed as a volunteer; and
条例 都是一样的
版主有了reward请问如何符合这一条
至于你说的那例子,貌似都我给出的三个test一个也不符合啊 那人一不是雇主,二工作不是ongoing三不是他主要赚钱收入的一部分,哪里符合了呢。