预算案对房地产影响？

talkaboutvision

Urgent legislation to cut through red tape and speed house-building in areas where homes are least affordable


看来基本就是加速审批。以后分地快，盖房快。价钱便宜不便宜不好说，但是按说对开发商是利好吧？

talkaboutvision

按说这个还是针对根本供需矛盾来做的，如果真的供给量上去了，肯定会让市场冷静些

1111

Housing NZ未来三年投入创纪录的29亿元，其中16亿元用于坎特伯雷地区新的住房发展和旧房维修；Project324为现有公屋新建2000个房间；在现有土地上新建500套两卧室住房；完成46,000套住房的隔热工作；震后升级和维修，包括修复坎特伯雷地区5000套公屋并新建700套住房。


这能影响奥克兰什么？奥克兰的人都辞去工作去坎特伯雷买房？

蓝山小野猫商铺

1111 发表于 2013-5-16 17:41
Housing NZ未来三年投入创纪录的29亿元，其中16亿元用于坎特伯雷地区新的住房发展和旧房维修；Project324为 ...

然后地震。。。

人又跑回了奥克兰。。。

冲击波又回来了。。。

这就是circle。。。

我猜的。。。

喜马拉雅大山猫

我坚信新西兰政府是没法调控房价的，GCD都干不了的事，他能搞定才怪

DoubleX

加速审批?拭目以待

NewLynnHse

能跌是最好的

talkaboutvision

其实我更想问的是,按说这个对开发商是利好,但是好像FBU之类的股票昨天没啥变化

看来资本和我想的不一致？

bungyjumping999

$2500 per sq m to build a house  x 200 sq m house = $500K
land cost say = $200k

Is difficult to built cheaper houses, these days.


Gov't say want to free up more land in rural areas, people can live in bombay hill, warkworth, Orewa, if there is no job opportunities there, how are they going to travel to work?
They cannot just built houses, but also commercial activities to sustain it.

Auckland council prefer using the existing land to create more houses, using the existing infrastructure & commercial activities. I think this is more workable than the govt view.

talkaboutvision

$2500 per sq m to build a house

这个太高了吧。。。普通房子1500-1600不就够了么？还是双层的价格

bungyjumping999

talkaboutvision 发表于 2013-5-17 11:25
$2500 per sq m to build a house

这个太高了吧。。。普通房子1500-1600不就够了么？还是双层的价格

$2500 per sq m , is taking capital contribution, consent fees, drainage, landscape etc into a/c

that is what builder said when i ask for a simple quote for a simple house.

at the end, i still think 2nd hand houses (old houses) are cheaper.