想买Honda CRV 求帮助

liqi3205

RT，论坛里有人开CRV么？07-08年那款，开起来感觉如何？现在车行价钱大概多少？
听说Honda车行，一般都不讲价？Trade In价钱也很低？有没有人买过？给点建议。谢谢了！

supertt

建议你等等，改款的马上就上市了，那现款到肯定会降不少的，尤其是二手车

大内密探007

lz没看另外个帖子么，百公里13个油

Eddie8848

LZ 你好, 我是在北岸本田上班的.

CRV 正準備改款,
2.0 2WD 會是$39,900
2.4 4WD Luxury 會是$48,900

舊款的即將減價, 如果不急的話建議等一下哦

Eddie8848

大内密探007 发表于 2012-5-28 22:40
lz没看另外个帖子么，百公里13个油

油耗主要是看怎麼開, 哪裡開.
我平均是11L/100km
既然說SUV 13l/100km 是油耗太高, 我最想問問, Petrol 的SUV 有哪一台是省油的呢?
車身比同Size的Sedan重, 而且型態沒有房車流線,
fuel efficiency 沒有房車好是肯定的了

liqi3205

Eddie8848 发表于 2012-5-29 08:53
LZ 你好, 我是在北岸本田上班的.

CRV 正準備改款,

噢谢谢了~那我再等等~新款大概什么时候上？

号小是我

我本来也想买一个CRV，结果价格坚挺无比，从日本直接顶也是巨贵无比。 只能等7月后了，等新版上市，再买个09款的。

大内密探007

Eddie8848 发表于 2012-5-29 08:56
油耗主要是看怎麼開, 哪裡開.
我平均是11L/100km
既然說SUV 13l/100km 是油耗太高, 我最想問問, Petrol ...

既然他不省油，那么带来哪些优势？安全性？比sedan高多少？还有。。  没有还有了
再说13的油耗，接近3.0的suv了，你的油耗低，只代表你前任保养的好，不代表综合情况怎么样。rav4全高速都开出过12.5

大内密探007

Eddie8848 发表于 2012-5-29 08:56
油耗主要是看怎麼開, 哪裡開.
我平均是11L/100km
既然說SUV 13l/100km 是油耗太高, 我最想問問, Petrol ...

要说省油，nissan的quashi，就是遥客，2.0 cvt的，不过算wagon

GRMVT

哦， nz new的还没有改款呀，JDM的去年11月已经上市了， 好像JDM的CRV现在也不是很贵

Eddie8848

大内密探007 发表于 2012-5-29 17:50
既然他不省油，那么带来哪些优势？安全性？比sedan高多少？还有。。  没有还有了
再说13的油耗，接近3.0 ...

2.4 的 SUV 基本都是>10l/100km
而且有人說是13L/100KM, 是怎麼開? 經常IDLE嗎? 保養有做好嗎? 這些都會影響油耗. 但沒說明好, 是很難說清是否耗油.
如果只拿一台車就能判斷CRV 是否太耗油, 那會否太不公平了?

Eddie8848

GRMVT 发表于 2012-5-29 19:00
哦， nz new的还没有改款呀，JDM的去年11月已经上市了， 好像JDM的CRV现在也不是很贵

7月7上市 :)

Eddie8848

大内密探007 发表于 2012-5-29 17:50
既然他不省油，那么带来哪些优势？安全性？比sedan高多少？还有。。  没有还有了
再说13的油耗，接近3.0 ...

而且, SUV的安全性從來都是比房車差.
但是又的確很多人喜歡SUV, 是Lifestyle 的問題吧.
我自己本人不太喜歡開SUV.

fran1215

Eddie8848 发表于 2012-5-30 10:21
而且, SUV的安全性從來都是比房車差.
但是又的確很多人喜歡SUV, 是Lifestyle 的問題吧.
我自己本人不太 ...

SUV的安全性比房车差？
你确定？

Eddie8848

fran1215 发表于 2012-5-30 20:29
SUV的安全性比房车差？
你确定？

Are they much safer than cars? The reality is that suv's are a great deal more dangerous than cars.
One NHTSA official once referred to them as the "neutron bombs of the road," as they tend to kill or maim their occupants in a collision, while leaving the suv relatively unharmed.
Most, not all - but most, suv's are built using "body on frame" construction. These frames are very heavy, and very rigid; and they do not absorb the kinetic energy of an impact well; rather, they transmit this energy through the vehicle. Tape an egg to the back of a sledgehammer, and then hit a large rock with the hammer to get an idea of how this works.
There is an suv's height as well. A higher center of gravity than a car, in a vehicle not much wider than a car, means it is easier to tip; particularly in emergency maneuver situations (swerving into another lane due to a deer on the roadway, wandering onto the shoulder at highway speed, and taking curves too fast and the like).
That height creates other dangers as well. Hit a car with a full size suv, and you have to contend with the suv frame being substantially higher off the ground than the frame of the car you hit. The higher frame of the suv tends to walk up over the lower frames of cars in a collision, given sufficient speed at impact.
Different standards. Suv's are not cars, and they are not built to car standards; but rather to what the government refers to as light truck standards. This means that they do not have to employ the same design safety features as cars do, and they do not have to be built to survive roll over events to the same standard that cars do.
Those are the basic points, but there are many others. Try finding the book "The High and the Mighty" at your local library; it does a magnificent job of detailing the problems inherent to suv's.
If you like suvs - that's just fine, but please do keep these basic points in mind. Don't drive them like you would a car. Be aware of their limitations. And if you want to use one to do actual work with, a plain old pickup truck will do just as well!

zlm873

d d d d d d d