真的不知道买什么车好。。。

ilmaro

爱国爱港 发表于 2012-3-31 00:54
听很多女的讲，有屁股的倒车有困难

...........荒谬。。。。。。。不理解她们是怎么想的。。。。。。所以我一直认为学车就该学手动档，学车就该学2吨卡车。。。。。。。要不然，这驾证全是不可靠的。。。。。。

ziyfan

350 z ........

爱国爱港

forexnz 发表于 2012-3-31 01:18
技术不是那么好，，开这个会被鄙视吧。。。。

被鄙视小事，350z是高性能跑车，技术不够开高性能跑车挺危险

ilmaro

forexnz 发表于 2012-3-31 01:15
还想问下新点的马2怎么样呢。。。。

买马二，我宁可买 TIIDA。

ilmaro

forexnz 发表于 2012-3-31 01:19
车小好找位。。。。

再小的车也是按标准轴距轮距设计的！和车型没有关系！车小未必好找位，只和开车的能力有关。

爱国爱港

ilmaro 发表于 2012-3-31 01:31
买马二，我宁可买 TIIDA。

TIIDA好像是CVT排档，别害LZ

ilmaro

爱国爱港 发表于 2012-3-31 01:33
TIIDA好像是CVT排档，别害LZ

CVT怎么了？nissan cvt 很好啊，我就有一辆TIIDA，加速快，省油，动力强，车型不大但内部空间很大很实用。CVT是将来的发展方向，现在的CVT，nissan 的质量最好。

ziyfan

350z.      真的， 别买其它小排量的，郁闷死你

ilmaro

forexnz 发表于 2012-3-31 01:49
买车很烦。。。。

没啥可烦的，是车总有不足，相对而言选个好一点性价比的就行了。

ilmaro

forexnz 发表于 2012-3-31 02:00
也是，，的确是萝卜白菜各有所爱。。。

是的，多听听他人意见，多学学相关知识，最终自己做出一个理智决定，就好了。

sukesl25

買個卡羅拉 車上裝兩100斤金輪泰國香米 外加兩桶25升太平牌花生油 車就夠重了~

爱国爱港

ilmaro 发表于 2012-3-31 01:36
CVT怎么了？nissan cvt 很好啊，我就有一辆TIIDA，加速快，省油，动力强，车型不大但内部空间很大很实用。 ...

http://www.dogandlemon.com/articles/automatics-cvt-transmissions

CVT Transmissions

Back in the 1950s, some automatic transmissions had only two gears. Two-speed transmissions were a pain, because when you were going up a hill you only had two options: first or second gear; it screamed in first gear or lost power in second. Then, as you went faster, the transmission was screaming because it needed an extra gear but didn’t have one.

Two-speed automatics were not only inconvenient to use, but they robbed the car’s engine of much of its power and drank fuel like there was no tomorrow.

You may never notice it, but your four or five-speed automatic suffers from the same problems as the two-speed one described above: it never gets the gears quite right. That’s why cars with conventional automatics never put out quite as much power as those with a manual gearbox and almost always use more fuel.

In the 1950s, a Dutch company called DAF came up with a new type of automatic transmission that solved the problems described above. Instead of having a small, fixed number of gears, DAF’s gearbox simply made up the gearing as it went along; the DAF transmission could change itself internally to produce a wide range of different gears, each one perfectly suited to the road conditions and driving style of that vehicle. The Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) was born.

There are no fixed gears (e.g., first, second, third, and so on) in a CVT. The transmission simply invents the right gear at the right time. In theory a CVT is the ideal gearbox.

In practice, however, most modern CVT gearboxes suffer from the same problems as their ancestors: because they don’t have gears (like on the back wheel of a bicycle), many CVTs use belts instead, like the one that goes around your waist. The problem is, these transmission belts break, no matter how well they’re made. When they break, the whole transmission has to come out, generally for a complete overhaul at great expense. CVT gearboxes that use chains are better, but they still break.

The carmakers knew this when they put these CVT transmissions onto the market, but they also knew that most of the CVTs wouldn’t break until the vehicle was out of guarantee, meaning it wouldn’t be the carmakers’ problem. However, even that scam didn’t work: both Nissan’s and Honda’s CVTs have been subject to multiple recalls, some on almost-new vehicles. It’s possible that someone will eventually figure out how to build a CVT transmission that lasts as long as a conventional manual gearbox, but we’re not holding our breath. In the meantime, the evidence to date suggests that CVT transmissions can easily become a nightmare for car owners.

The fact that many CVT transmissions die young shouldn’t be your problem; the easiest option is to simply avoid CVT transmissions entirely!

爱国爱港

forexnz 发表于 2012-3-31 01:49
完全不懂。。。。

LZ如果英语好，有时间看看
http://www.dogandlemon.com/articles

ilmaro

爱国爱港 发表于 2012-3-31 10:02
http://www.dogandlemon.com/articles/automatics-cvt-transmissions

CVT Transmissions

不必过份的痴迷于评论啦，要结合设计的可发展性、先进性、以及当前的技术成熟性来总体判断才好。CVT技术对于动力的使用效率最高，动力输出最连贯，结构最简单，是一种最具有发展潜能的传动技术。就目前而言，结构的设计已非常成熟，正处于完善期。目前困扰发展的是如何使它能承受更大的力，这需要材料学方面的进步不假。nissan 公司在这方面，是有独到之处的，如果我要买 CVT车，我只会买 nissan 的。nissan 公司早在10年前就在 3.5排量的重型房车上都敢使用CVT，这足以说明它们是信心的。这些年来，我们看真实的看到了这些车的可靠性。那我相信这近8年来新开发的新用材的CVT就是可以信任的。而BLUEBIRD和TIIDA用的正是这新的CVT，而车的排量是小型的家用车。我觉得可以信任。我曾是设计发动机的，所以我会从结构原理上理解到技术的发展前景以及可能存在的问题，会对技术的各方面都有所考量。相信我兄弟，nissan 在2003年7月以后的车款上使用的 nissan 新 CVT 可以有信任度。顺便提一句，中国目前已把CVT技术做为传动系统发展的大方向，正在努力攻关发展新一代CVT，包括在柴油发动机传动系统上。欧美国家也在跟上。个人认为新一代氢动力转子发动机+CVT 组合，将是汽车新一代革命的基石。因为这两种技术的适配性相当好，发展前景最大。如果我能在新西兰做回老本行，有发言权，我一定终身致力于这两方面。

coldplay

2w以内，没屁股，绝壁corolla，可以买到07或者08的，开起来很稳

sevenstar

forexnz 发表于 2012-3-31 00:53
喜欢mini，，可是怕不好养，，1系会不会大呢，，我喜欢小小的车。。平时就是自己开开。。

1系不大，就是不知道预算够不够~~~~！MINI还好吧~~~~~没那么脆弱，要按时保养

sevenstar

爱国爱港 发表于 2012-3-31 01:32
这些欧洲车要买新的，别害人叫人买二手

欧洲车 没你想象得那么脆弱~~~~~~买日本进的4分以上车还是不错的

我爸10几年前有一辆4灯老宝马5系 ，开着一点问题没有~~~~~~宝马很耐用的

取暖基本靠抖

欧洲车是保养维修贵，但是也没那么夸张，现在怎么都被妖魔化了，受不了。买个车况好的，天天代代步，定时保养 那里那么容易坏。 （本人开日本车，只是实在看不下去了）。
mini就很好，室友开了几年了也没啥问题。
golf应该也不错。
日本车swift,corrola,civic 应该也很对楼主的选择。