- UID
- 339792
- 热情
- 15762
- 人气
- 21317
- 主题
- 204
- 帖子
- 4457
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 20960
- 分享
- 0
- 记录
- 0
- 相册
- 2
- 好友
- 0
- 日志
- 0
- 在线时间
- 8955 小时
- 注册时间
- 2012-9-1
- 阅读权限
- 30
- 最后登录
- 2024-11-18
升级 4.8% - UID
- 339792
- 热情
- 15762
- 人气
- 21317
- 主题
- 204
- 帖子
- 4457
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 20960
- 阅读权限
- 30
- 注册时间
- 2012-9-1
|
someone at the top already said, the seller asked the buyer to pay $2.3 million deposit released from the trust account for seller use, in return he sold the property for $3million, so much cheaper than the market price.
Again, the buyer doesn't know behind the back, there was a large debt to a lending company, which is more than $3 million to settle. The debt is not a new debt, it is an existing debt noted on the title, the settlement sum is more than $3million.
补充内容 (2023-11-11 11:56):
The mistake the buyer made was "buy cheap" and "agreed" to release the fund $2.3million to seller without holding the fund in the trust account.
补充内容 (2023-11-11 11:57):
May be also, because it is "cheap", the buyer agreed to release the fund and put it in writing in the agreement, so, no one to blame.
补充内容 (2023-11-11 12:03):
Another lesson from this case, is when dealing with "limited company" as a seller, more "suspicion and due-diligence" are needed, as the company is just a shell company holding a single property. |
|