- UID
- 194598
- 热情
- 26
- 人气
- 1
- 主题
- 0
- 帖子
- 188
- 精华
- 2
- 积分
- 113
- 分享
- 0
- 记录
- 0
- 相册
- 0
- 好友
- 0
- 日志
- 0
- 在线时间
- 195 小时
- 注册时间
- 2009-8-4
- 阅读权限
- 20
- 最后登录
- 2011-1-24
升级 13% - UID
- 194598
- 热情
- 26
- 人气
- 1
- 主题
- 0
- 帖子
- 188
- 精华
- 2
- 积分
- 113
- 阅读权限
- 20
- 注册时间
- 2009-8-4
|
Utilitarianism
Relevant quotes from the speech:
No one knows how many groups and organizations are working on the most salient issues of our day: climate change, poverty, deforestation, peace, water, hunger, conservation, human rights, and more. This is the largest movement the world has ever seen.
We have an economy that tells us that it is cheaper to destroy earth in real time than to renew, restore, and sustain it. You can print money to bail out a bank but you can't print life to bail out a planet. At present we are stealing the future, selling it in the present, and calling it gross domestic product. We can just as easily have an economy that is based on healing the future instead of stealing it. We can either create assets for the future or take the assets of the future.
We have tens of thousands of abandoned homes without people and tens of thousands of abandoned people without homes.
Point one:
The right action is the one that will likely produce the greatest amount of happiness for all concerned than any other alternative. (this is the point central to utilitarianism. If you don’t understand this, you deserve to fail.)
Ok, the question raised by protecting environment is whether this course of action is to give the greatest amount of happiness for all concerned than any other alternative. As shown in this speech, it is clear that this action is ethical, because it has attracted support from an increasing number of people worldwide. In the past, people might destroy the environment in order to get GDP, but now people who are worried about the long-term impact of a degrading environment have appeared to outnumber those who are not sensitive to this issue.
Point two:
The right action deals with particular acts in their context
That’s where Kantism and utilitarianism crashes. Kantism advocates one’s moral duty regardless of contexts, while utilitarianism suggests that contexts can justify one’s actions. What if one chops down a tree to collect wood so his family can keep warm and survive a long winter? Yes, cutting trees is not ethical, but it might be ethical in that context. Use this example to get some insights into utilitarianism, although nowhere in the speech can you find information about a context that justifies any action to destroy the planet.
Point three:
Utilitarianism treats everyone equally
Everyone here means everyone at present and everyone in future. Everyone here means everyone in developed countries and everyone in developing countries. The environment has been destroyed by some people in their own interests while at the expense of other people. Many people get wealthy in this world by exploiting other people. It appears that some people’s pleasure is far more important than other people’s pleasure. Once everybody’s pleasure is considered, we might conclude that many people’s interest has been ignored when we destroy the environment for our own pleasure.
Point four:
Utilitarianism is concerned about long-term consequences as well as short-term consequences.
As indicated in the speech, “At present we are stealing the future, selling it in the present, and calling it gross domestic product. We can just as easily have an economy that is based on healing the future instead of stealing it”, we have too often been chasing immediate pleasure, such as a faster car, a warmer home, more durables, but this pleasure comes at the cost of environment.
Point five:
The problem of utilitarianism is that sometimes it allows trivial pleasures to outweigh serious pains.
Ok, if utilitarianism does allow us to destroy the environment in exchange for better standards of living, this pleasure is trivial compared to the pains, such as abnormal climate, global warming, barren lands, and so forth.
Note: there are some other points fundamental to utilitarianism, please check class notes to find them out. This list of points is not exhaustive. |
|