奥克兰的什么破大桥啊，要50多亿纽币，还不如外包给阿富汗

我是新西兰人!

真TMD的贵啊！
而且2座桥在那里，那情形是好笑呢？还是好看？严重破坏遣返制度的形象。

要修隧道就要我们自己掏钱？
我才不掏！别征我什么特别税！ 这么大个国家自己去想办法挣钱啊缺钱就知道加税！
我又不住北岸，花了钱我也用不到啊！实在我要去北岸，我宁愿按次计费。

John.G

还是实实在在的搞好公交才是王道。。。
不如搞几条轻轨，搞几条地铁了。。

呼啸寒风

垃圾干活一个干三个看，都tm骗钱的，从救援队到海关，工作全tm就是浪费时间，纯骗。。。。。

Venox10111

这算什么,某国换个路牌,就超过2个亿美刀了,平均一块1k美刀
NZ政府不从税里凑钱,或者借钱,还有什么办法啊? 能偷不?能抢不?
如果你能做的更好,你完全可以竞选下一任总理

无色咖啡

50亿只是初级预算，工程开始后，起码10亿的Variations。哈哈

陌生的香港人

This kind of argument can go on and on with numerous studies done over the years and cost of construction keeps increasing but the thing is still never built. Also, the latest proposal plus the cost estimate released by the NZTA is just for a crossing to be used by CARS only, which is different from the last proposal where there was a rail component in it, with a termianl proposed somewhere at Akoranga Drive (near the current AUT North Shore Campus) near Takapuna.

NZTA simply takes the train element away this time in its latest evaluation of bridge vs tunnel options - this again may diminish a hope that there will be a rail service to the Shore in mid-term and means the new crossing, even built, will be congested very quickly as road building can never match the pace of an increase in the number of motor vehicles and population growth, unless one of the roads is tolled.

On the other hand, the Auckland Council and the National Government are still arguing on how to fund that "CBD Rail Loop" project - a rail project that just adds 3 to 4 more stations near the fringe of the CBD area to make the rail likes a 'loop' - and they think by doing this, it would save the world and more people would take trains!  

I don't see too much value to build this CBD Rail Loop but think $$$ may be better spent on other areas where the expansion to the current rail network could make some real difference to people's travel behaviour. For example, in a longer term, Auckland at least needs (1). rail linking Otahuhu and Avondale, (2). rail to North Shore and (3). rail connecting the Auckland Isthmus and the Eastern Suburbs (Pakuranga and Howick - as there is simply no rail over there at all!) in order to form a reasonable/workable regioal rail network if it wants people not to rely on cars.

Unfortunately, Auckland is simply not Shanghai so these projects doomed to be too "big" fpr Kiwis so they could only remain to be a dream.....

无过

该开车的还是开车，不觉得能有多大的改善

花天堂

Strongly support user pays.

Toll bridge is Kings road.

家里有棉花糖

toll bridge。。。。住北岸去city工作的人哭了！

萨米

真TMD的贵啊！
而且2座桥在那里，那情形是好笑呢？还是好看？严重破坏遣返制度的形象。

要修隧道就要我们自己掏钱？
我才不掏！别征我什么特别税！ 这么大个国家自己去想办法挣钱啊缺钱就知道加税！
我又不住北 ...
我是新西兰人! 发表于 2011-3-24 21:07

你是狭隘的，北岸交通解决了，奥克兰交通也会被解决。NZ交通也会被解决。世界交通也能被解决。任重道远啊。

花天堂

toll bridge。。。。住北岸去city工作的人哭了！
家里有棉花糖 发表于 2011-3-25 14:25

then dont live there~~ consider somewhere else~~

阿海

User pays = more $$$ = better roads and transport options.

5bn 不只是桥，还要填海造路，不是你想得那么简单的。

家里有棉花糖

then dont live there~~ consider somewhere else~~
花天堂 发表于 2011-3-25 14:34

那还得卖房！！

moto345

{:8_383:}cao
要花这么多钱。干活时。工们人那们轻松样哦。。。哎

张望

杭州湾大桥才投资118亿人民币-长36公里
AKL那个湾有36公里？要250多亿？
包出去不好吗？靠新西兰的鸟人，得干多少年？
地面上几百米的小桥都干了2年，这个跨海的怎么不得干个10-15年？

阿戴

我支持 但是得請中國人來蓋

theisland

This kind of argument can go on and on with numerous studies done over the years and cost of construction keeps increasing but the thing is still never built. Also, the latest proposal plus the cost e ...
陌生的香港人 发表于 2011-3-25 13:13

你在写报告吗？ 呵呵

Mornington

垃圾干活一个干三个看，都tm骗钱的，从救援队到海关，工作全tm就是浪费时间，纯骗。。。。。
呼啸寒风 发表于 2011-3-24 22:56

既然这么好，有没有考虑转行干这个~~又轻松又赚钱，多爽